Are onahole more physically stimulating than the real thing?
Posted: 2017 Jan 19, 09:23
Hi all,
Someone in an online roleplaying chatroom I frequent linked me to this website, http://www.healthystrokes.com (for tl;dr read on), which talks about 5-10% of men discovering masturbation by rubbing against something instead of playing with it. I am one of those % and have gotten head from a woman which was completely boring and I had to think of something else to cum for her.
It also talks about how guys who get off "prone" like me have trouble getting used to sex with a woman because there's so much less physical stimulation than a pillow provides, "Even males who enjoy masturbating the conventional way don't get as much stimulation from intercourse as from masturbation. For males who masturbate prone, the amount of stimulation in intercourse is a small fraction of what they get masturbating."
I've never really felt any kind of "romantic feelings" for anyone, so for me sex with someone would be completely about physical stimuli. I've often wondered why no onahole claim to be "just like the real thing", as I have always assumed (incorrectly?) that the real things provide the most stimulation possible. The one I did manage to find that tried to be realistic was a unit that tried to emulate anal sex and the description said it wasn't particularly stimulating.
Firstly, I wondered if anybody could tell me if this is true (romantic feelings aside)? Could the reason I was bored by her be the lack of stimulation?
And secondly, how do onaholes fit into this picture? Are they far more physically stimulating than pussy or a sheet? From a purely physical standpoint, might using one completely remove my ability to get used to a chick? (I'd consider this a positive outcome
)
Thanks! UwU
Someone in an online roleplaying chatroom I frequent linked me to this website, http://www.healthystrokes.com (for tl;dr read on), which talks about 5-10% of men discovering masturbation by rubbing against something instead of playing with it. I am one of those % and have gotten head from a woman which was completely boring and I had to think of something else to cum for her.
It also talks about how guys who get off "prone" like me have trouble getting used to sex with a woman because there's so much less physical stimulation than a pillow provides, "Even males who enjoy masturbating the conventional way don't get as much stimulation from intercourse as from masturbation. For males who masturbate prone, the amount of stimulation in intercourse is a small fraction of what they get masturbating."
I've never really felt any kind of "romantic feelings" for anyone, so for me sex with someone would be completely about physical stimuli. I've often wondered why no onahole claim to be "just like the real thing", as I have always assumed (incorrectly?) that the real things provide the most stimulation possible. The one I did manage to find that tried to be realistic was a unit that tried to emulate anal sex and the description said it wasn't particularly stimulating.
Firstly, I wondered if anybody could tell me if this is true (romantic feelings aside)? Could the reason I was bored by her be the lack of stimulation?
And secondly, how do onaholes fit into this picture? Are they far more physically stimulating than pussy or a sheet? From a purely physical standpoint, might using one completely remove my ability to get used to a chick? (I'd consider this a positive outcome

Thanks! UwU